The Colbert on Kimmel Suspension Explained: A Comprehensive Analysis of Late-Night Industry Protocols
The "Colbert on Kimmel suspension" refers to the confusion surrounding the temporary off-air status of Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show and Jimmy Kimmel’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! during the 2023 Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike. This was not a disciplinary action by networks against the hosts, but a collective industry-wide work stoppage resulting from the breakdown of labor negotiations between the WGA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP).
The Context of Late-Night Labor Disputes
To understand why the hosts were effectively "suspended" from their normal broadcast duties, one must look at the structural requirements of late-night talk shows. These programs are highly dependent on daily scripts, monologues, and sketches written by a dedicated team of writers. Unlike reality television or unscripted news programs, the intellectual property of a late-night show is fundamentally tied to the writers' room.
When the WGA declared a strike on May 2, 2023, the primary objective was to secure fair compensation, address the encroachment of artificial intelligence in scriptwriting, and establish better residuals for streaming content. For late-night hosts like Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel, who are themselves members of the Writers Guild of America, the picket line was not a professional choice but an obligation.
Because the writers were no longer providing the material required to produce a standard broadcast, the production of these shows became impossible under union rules. Consequently, the networks—CBS for The Late Show and ABC for Jimmy Kimmel Live!—had no choice but to place the programs on an indefinite hiatus. This state of operational suspension persisted for the duration of the strike, which lasted 148 days, marking one of the longest labor disputes in the history of the entertainment industry.
Distinguishing Suspension from Cancellation
A common point of public confusion during the 2023 strike involved the terminology used in media reports. Terms like "suspension" or "dark" were frequently utilized, leading some viewers to speculate that the hosts had been reprimanded or that the shows were in danger of permanent cancellation.
In the context of broadcast television, "going dark" or entering a "suspension of production" is a standard operational procedure during labor disputes or extreme production constraints. It signifies that the program has paused its cycle of daily recording. There was never an attempt by the networks to terminate these contracts or replace the hosts during this period. The programs remained under active contract, with the networks intending to return to production the moment a collective bargaining agreement was ratified.
The suspension was a direct result of the lack of a "workable" production environment. Without the WGA writers, the shows lost their structural integrity. Even though hosts are often talented improvisers, they are bound by contractual agreements with the Guild that prohibit them from performing duties normally covered by striking writers while the strike is in effect.
The Role of the Writers Guild of America (WGA)
The WGA represents thousands of writers who craft the dialogue, jokes, and segments seen on screen. The strike was initiated because negotiations for a new Minimum Basic Agreement (MBA) reached an impasse. The key pillars of the dispute were:
- Residuals: As the industry shifted toward streaming models, the historical model for calculating residual payments became insufficient. Writers argued that their compensation did not reflect the global success of their content on platforms like Paramount+ or Disney+.
- Artificial Intelligence: The emergence of generative AI posed an existential threat to the profession. The WGA sought contractual protections that would prevent studios from using AI to write or rewrite literary material, or to use writers' work to train AI models without consent.
- Staffing and Duration: The rise of "mini-rooms"—smaller, short-term writing teams—deprived writers of steady income and professional development opportunities.
For hosts like Colbert and Kimmel, the "suspension" of their shows was a signal of their solidarity with their writing staffs. Both hosts were vocal in their support, frequently appearing on picket lines and ensuring that their non-writing staff members were supported during the period of halted production.
Operational Impacts and Financial Considerations
During the 148-day period of suspended activity, the financial impact was felt across several layers of the production chain.
| Stakeholder | Impact of Production Suspension |
|---|---|
| Hosts | Ceased filming; participated in advocacy and public support for writers. |
| WGA Writers | Stopped all writing services; participated in picket lines. |
| Networks (CBS/ABC) | Shifted to reruns or alternate programming; lost ad revenue. |
| Production Crew | Faced temporary unemployment or reduced shifts due to lack of filming. |
| Advertisers | Experienced a loss of daily high-value inventory for brand placement. |
The reliance on reruns proved to be a difficult financial transition for networks. Late-night television is designed to be topical, meaning its value depreciates rapidly once the cultural moment passes. Airing months-old monologues is a significant departure from the business model of these shows, which rely on current events to drive social media engagement and live ratings.
Comparison of Network Responses
While the primary cause of the suspension was industry-wide, the responses from CBS and ABC were largely synchronized. Both networks prioritized maintaining their relationships with talent while navigating the legal complexities of a massive labor shutdown.
- CBS (The Late Show with Stephen Colbert): CBS opted to utilize reruns from the prior season. Colbert maintained a high profile through social media and public appearances, reinforcing the necessity of the writers' demands.
- *ABC (Jimmy Kimmel Live!):* ABC similarly paused fresh production. Jimmy Kimmel was notably active in the public discourse surrounding the strike, frequently using his platform and social media to highlight the issues faced by writers in the gig economy.
Neither host faced individual penalties for the suspension. Instead, both were viewed as leaders who helped bring attention to the systemic issues within the entertainment industry.
Path to Resolution: Returning to Air
The suspension ended in late September 2023, following the WGA’s announcement that a tentative agreement had been reached. The resumption of The Late Show and Jimmy Kimmel Live! required a logistical restart. Sets had been dormant, staff had been dispersed, and the topical nature of the shows meant writers had to immediately pivot to addressing months of backlog and current cultural events.
The return to work marked the end of the "suspension." It was not a restart in the sense of a new show or a new contract, but a resumption of the existing production cycle. The agreement secured by the WGA provided significant gains, including increases in minimum pay, protections against AI, and transparency regarding streaming metrics, which fundamentally altered the landscape in which these late-night programs now operate as of 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was the suspension a punishment for the hosts? No. The suspension was an operational necessity caused by the WGA strike. As members of the union, the hosts could not cross the picket line to perform their shows, and without their writing staffs, the shows could not fulfill their daily content requirements.
Did the hosts continue to get paid during the suspension? The financial arrangements between late-night hosts and their networks are private, multi-year contracts. Generally, such contracts include provisions for production hiatuses, whether caused by labor disputes, illness, or scheduled breaks. The suspension did not constitute a termination of these contracts.
Could the shows have continued without writers? Technically, a host could improvise a show, but doing so would have violated WGA strike rules. Any "on-the-fly" writing performed by the host would be considered a breach of the union's strike mandate, potentially leading to professional sanctions against the host.
Did the networks attempt to replace the hosts? There were no credible reports of networks attempting to replace either Colbert or Kimmel during the 2023 strike. These hosts are integral to their respective networks' brand identities and audience demographics; replacing them would have been counter-productive and likely viewed as an escalatory tactic by the unions.
How long did the strike last? The WGA strike lasted from May 2, 2023, until September 27, 2023, a total of 148 days. This period defined the length of the suspension for all late-night programs, including those hosted by Colbert and Kimmel.
Practical Recommendations for Industry Observers
For those interested in the future of broadcast labor, it is essential to distinguish between localized production pauses—which are common during summer breaks or holidays—and industry-wide labor disputes. If a program goes "dark" due to a strike, the primary source of information should always be the official statements from the WGA or the AMPTP. Official press releases from network parent companies (such as Paramount Global or Disney) also provide the clearest insight into the anticipated return dates for broadcast talent. To avoid misinformation, rely on verified industry trade publications rather than speculative social media discourse.
Image Gallery
Select an image to open it in a new tab.
Lars Thomsen
Global Labor Markets and Economic Strategy Editor